Trust is earned.
Not purchased.
Our aim is to make club information easier to compare and questions easier to ask. A paid application is never a shortcut to a positive review.
What we look at
Where information is available, our editorial review framework considers reliability and transparency, game selection, bonuses and promotions, casual-player suitability, deposits and withdrawals, and software convenience.
Evidence matters
We aim to distinguish information supplied by a club from information independently checked by our team. Claims such as RNG certification, network affiliation, payment availability, payout speed and player eligibility should be supported by current evidence before being described as verified.
Editorial ratings
Scores should be based on documented criteria and a dated review record. A score should not be treated as a guarantee or prediction of future results. Where evidence is limited, we should say so rather than imply certainty.
Player reviews
Player submissions should be moderated for relevance, abusive content, conflicts of interest and obvious manipulation. We may request context or proof. We do not publish fabricated testimonials as genuine player experiences. Sponsored or incentivized submissions must be clearly disclosed.
Paid listing applications
Club operators may submit an application for a $200 review/listing fee. Applications are assessed manually. Payment does not guarantee acceptance, verification, placement, a positive score or continued publication. We may reject or remove listings that fail our requirements or provide misleading information.
Corrections and complaints
To request a correction, contact [email protected] and include the page, the specific statement and supporting evidence. We review credible corrections and may update, annotate or remove information.
Commercial relationships must never be presented as independent endorsement. Paid placements should be labeled, and editorial conclusions remain subject to evidence.