Independent information resource18+ · Play responsibly
Transparency

Our editorial standards

A useful review website needs a transparent process for sourcing, updating and correcting information.

Sources and verification

Official terms and documentation are the preferred sources for platform rules. Third-party claims are identified as such and are not automatically treated as verified facts.

Authorship and review dates

Each substantive article should identify a real author or responsible editor and show a reviewed date only after an actual review has taken place.

Corrections

Readers can contact us with the URL, the disputed passage and supporting evidence. Material corrections should be made promptly and noted where appropriate.

Reviews and ratings

We do not invent hands-on tests, star ratings, user reviews, traffic figures or payment claims. If direct testing has not occurred, the page must say so.

Commercial disclosure

Any permitted paid placement, referral relationship or other material connection will be disclosed clearly. No commercial link should be activated until its permission and legality are checked.

TelegramWhatsAppEmail